top of page

"We Don't See Things As They Are – We See Them As We Are": Implications for Investors

Updated: Apr 13



The statement "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are" is often attributed to the writer Anais Nin. While it may sound philosophical in nature, its implications resonate deeply with the world of investing. This perspective suggests that our personal biases, experiences, and perceptions shape how we interpret and interact with the world. For investors, this means that personal biases can significantly impact investment decisions. Let's delve into this concept further and explore its implications with relevant examples.



Confirmation Bias


Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or strengthens our pre-existing beliefs or hypotheses. Consider an investor who believes that electric vehicles (EVs) represent the future of the automotive industry. They might disproportionately seek out news articles, expert opinions, or data that supports the growth of EVs while ignoring or downplaying counterarguments or potential risks related to EV companies. This bias can lead investors to make decisions based on a skewed set of information, potentially resulting in poor investment outcomes.


Overconfidence Bias


Overconfidence bias is the tendency for individuals to overestimate their abilities or the precision of their beliefs. Example: An investor might believe they can consistently beat the market because they've had a few successful stock picks in the past. This overconfidence might lead them to make riskier investments, thinking they're immune to market downturns. Overestimating one's abilities can lead to increased risks and potential financial losses.


Anchoring Bias


Anchoring is the reliance on the first piece of information encountered (the "anchor") when making decisions. Example: If an investor first hears about a stock when it's priced at $100, they might anchor to that price. If the stock then drops to $80, they might view it as a bargain, even if the intrinsic value of the company has also decreased. Anchoring can lead investors to make decisions based on irrelevant reference points, potentially resulting in poor investment choices.



Herd mentality refers to the phenomenon where individuals are influenced by their peers to adopt certain behaviors or follow trends. Example: The dot-com bubble of the late 1990s saw investors flocking to buy technology stocks, driven by the fear of missing out (FOMO) and the assumption that others must know something they didn’t. This resulted in inflated valuations and, eventually, a market crash. Following the herd can lead to overvaluation and subsequent market corrections, which can be detrimental for late entrants to such trends.


Loss Aversion Bias


Loss aversion refers to the psychological phenomenon where people tend to strongly prefer avoiding losses than acquiring equivalent gains. In other words, the pain of losing is psychologically more impactful than the pleasure of gaining. Example: An investor who holds onto a losing stock for longer than is rational, hoping it will return to its purchase price, is exhibiting loss aversion. This could lead to even greater losses if the stock continues to decline. This can cause investors to hold onto poor investments too long, hoping for a turnaround, rather than cutting their losses and moving on.


Recency Bias


Recency bias is the tendency to weigh the latest information more heavily than older data. Example: If an investor sees a stock performing well in the recent past, they might assume it will continue to perform well in the future, ignoring longer-term performance data that might suggest otherwise. This can lead to short-sighted decisions based on transient market conditions.


Status Quo Bias


This is the preference for the current state of affairs, and the resistance to change. Example: An investor might stick with the same portfolio allocation for years without reassessing, simply because it's what they're used to, even if market conditions or personal financial situations have changed. This can result in missed opportunities or increased risks as market dynamics shift.


How to Counteract these Biases?


  • Self-awareness: Regular introspection can help investors recognize their biases. By being aware of them, they can make conscious efforts to counteract them.

  • Diversify sources of information: Relying on a range of sources, and even seeking counter-opinions, can help mitigate the risk of confirmation bias.

  • Adopt a systematic investment approach: Following a predefined set of rules or criteria can help in making more rational decisions.

  • Seek expert opinions: Financial advisors or investment professionals can provide an outside perspective, acting as a check against potential biases.


Advanced Counteractive Strategies


  • Periodic Portfolio Review: Regularly review and rebalance your portfolio. This not only ensures alignment with your financial goals but also counteracts status quo and loss aversion biases.

  • Set Clear Investment Goals: Having clear, predefined goals can act as a grounding point, helping to prevent being swayed by short-term market movements or trends.

  • Implement Stop-Loss Strategies: This can be a way to counteract loss aversion. By setting a predetermined level at which you'll sell a declining asset, you're taking the emotion out of the decision.

  • Stay Educated: Continuously educate yourself about market dynamics and the psychology of investing. The more you understand the common pitfalls, the better equipped you'll be to avoid them.

  • Create a Decision Journal: Documenting your investment decisions, and the reasons behind them, can provide valuable insights when reviewed periodically. It can highlight recurring biases in your decision-making process.


The journey of investing is as much a journey inward as it is an exploration of the market landscape. In this intricate dance between financial logic and emotional impulse, the wise investor recognizes that their most formidable adversary is often themselves. Our evolutionary history has equipped us with cognitive biases designed to navigate a world much different from today's complex financial markets. These biases, while once instrumental for our ancestors' survival, can be the very snares that entangle the modern investor in a web of suboptimal decisions. Understanding and acknowledging these biases isn't merely a process of intellectual recognition; it’s a proactive engagement with one's financial psyche. By cultivating self-awareness, continually seeking education, and employing structured strategies like regular portfolio reviews, clear goal setting, stop-loss mechanisms, and decision journals, investors can effectively counteract these deeply ingrained tendencies. Moreover, the modern financial world's ever-evolving nature requires adaptability, a quality that can only be fully harnessed when one is unburdened from the weight of unexamined biases. By seeing the market not just as it appears through the lens of our personal experiences and biases but for the dynamic entity it truly is, investors can make decisions that are not just reactionary but visionary. In essence, the world of investing offers a mirror to our innermost tendencies, challenges, and potential for growth. It's not merely about financial gains but also the evolution of the investor. In understanding the market, we come to understand ourselves better and vice versa. Embracing this symbiotic relationship between self-awareness and market acumen is the cornerstone of not only financial success but also personal growth and evolution in the intricate world of investing.

9 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page