top of page

Understanding Cooperative Game Theory for Savvy Investing

In the world of investing, it's not just about making the best individual moves - it's also about recognizing how your actions interact with those of other market participants. This is where cooperative game theory comes into play. Cooperative game theory is a field that analyzes how groups of players can work together for mutual benefit through cooperative behavior and coalition formation. At its core, cooperative game theory revolves around the concept of the "characteristic function." This mathematical function assigns a value to each possible coalition or subset of players, representing the total payoff that the coalition members could secure by cooperating together. The key insight is that for many real-world situations, the maximum total benefit is achieved through cooperation rather than competition.

Glove Game Example

One classic example from game theory is the "glove game." Suppose there are two players, each owning one left-hand glove and one right-hand glove. On their own, a single glove has no value. However, if the players cooperate and contribute their gloves to form a pair, both receive full value from the pair of gloves. This simple example illustrates the benefits of cooperation. So how does this apply to investing? Consider a company with two major shareholders who each own 30% of the shares. Neither shareholder has a controlling interest, but if they cooperate by voting together as a bloc, they can effectively control the company's direction. This gives them much more influence than if they simply acted independently.

Cooperative Game Theory in Investing

Coalition formation is also critical in corporate takeover battles and proxy contests. Different shareholder groups may form cooperating coalitions to increase their voting power and sway over the company. Activist investors often rely on building supportive coalitions when pushing for changes at companies they've targeted. Even in public equity markets, cooperative game theory principles emerge. For example, if a group of major institutional investors collectively own a significant portion of a company's shares, they may cooperate through shared voting and engagement policies to maximize their influence as "permanent capital providers."

Coalition Formation in Corporations

On the other side, companies themselves can employ cooperative game theory strategies. They may seek to build cooperative relationships and strategic alliances with suppliers, customers, and even competitors through bargaining, negotiation, and incentive alignment. Cross-ownership of shares, joint ventures, and partnerships allow firms to navigate competitive landscapes in more cooperative ways.

Mergers & Acquisitions Synergies

In the mergers and acquisitions realm, cooperative game theory manifests itself through value enhancement and synergy calculations. The total value created by combining two firms often exceeds the sum of their individual market capitalizations - but this surplus value depends on successful post-merger cooperation and integration. These examples only scratch the surface of cooperative game theory's applicability to investing and corporate decision-making. By recognizing opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation and understanding coalition formation dynamics, savvy investors can make better-informed decisions and potentially reap greater rewards.

The Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Reality

However, it's important to note that real-world situations often involve a mix of competitive and cooperative elements. Pure cooperation is rare, and maintaining stable coalitions over time can be challenging. Regulators also keep closewatch to ensure collaborative behaviors don't cross into anti-competitive territory.

Game Theory and Negotiation Tactics

Cooperative game theory has major implications for negotiations between parties that have some incentive to cooperate. Some key principles and tactics derived from cooperative game theory include:

  • Finding the "Core" Solution: The core represents the set of payoff distributions that no coalition would be motivated to deviate from. Finding an outcome in the core maximizes stability.

  • The Shapley Value: This concept assigns a unique payoff distribution to players based on their relative marginal contributions across all coalitions. It can guide fair revenue/profit sharing formulas.

  • Bargaining and Strategic Moves: Strategies like making non-credible threats, committing to future actions, and employing brinkmanship are analyzed through a cooperative game theory lens.

These ideas have applications in investment scenarios like joint ventures, syndicated deals, litigation/dispute resolution, and labor negotiations.

Evaluating Cooperative Games Quantitatively

While some cooperative games can be analyzed qualitatively, sophisticated techniques exist for assigning numerical payoffs and values:

  • Characteristic Function Games: The characteristic function form compactly represents payoffs for every coalition using set mathematical notation.

  • Partition Function Games: These generalize characteristic functions to account for influences across coalitions (e.g. competition or complementarities).

  • Solution Concepts: The Core, Shapley Value, Nucleolus and other solution concepts provide axiom-based methods for distributing payoffs fairly.

Quantitative methods allow modeling of highly complex multi-party investment situations. They are especially relevant for large investors co-investing through exclusive groups/clubs.

Evolutionary Game Theory and Emergence

Classical cooperative game theory often assumes full rationality and credible enforceable agreements. But cooperation can also emerge naturally:

  • Through evolution over time as strategies reproduce success

  • When there are mechanisms ensuring future reciprocity

  • Via social norms, reputational effects, and other institutional factors

Investors can monitor the emergence of cooperative behaviors within industries, and also structure incentives to make value-creating cooperation self-sustaining.

Empirical Evidence from Finance

A growing body of empirical research in finance validates the importance of cooperation for value creation:

  • Studies of joint ventures, strategic alliances, and inter-firm relationships

  • Performance impacts of cooperative/contestable institutional ownership

  • Bargaining dynamics in M&A deals, proxy fights, and restructuring events

  • Cooperation-focused alternative theories of the firm

Empirical results increasingly confirm the relevance of cooperative game theory for understanding firm behaviors and investment outcomes.

Overall, cooperative game theory represents a powerful interdisciplinary framework bridging economics, mathematics, negotiation science, and evolutionary theory. For the sophisticated investor, it provides crucial insights into the dynamics, tactics, quantitative modeling, and empirical realities of value creation through strategic cooperation.

5 views0 comments


bottom of page